MEMO TO ALEX BERENSON: READERS OF SPY THRILLER NOVELS DO NOT CARE FOR GRATUTIOUS POLITICAL OPINIONS Print E-mail
Written by Cisco   
Wednesday, 12 March 2008
BOOK REVIEW: The Ghost War. Written by Alex Berenson. Published by G.P. Putnam's Sons, 2008

 

The Ghost War
Best Price $12.45

While I was in college, I did not have a great deal of time to spend on recreational reading. I worked at two jobs through most of my college years, and so when I wasn't studying or delivering furniture or driving an ambulance or washing cars, I was usually sleeping or eating. But even with my limited available time, I was able to read occasionally, and if I were to be honest with myself, I would have to admit that there were times when I allowed reading to interfere with studying.

 

In those days I had three favorite writers: James Fenimore Cooper, Charles Dickens, and Robert Ludlum. I know. I know. Those three writers are widely diverse in their subject matter, and many literary purists would very much like to beat me severely about the head and shoulders for mentioning Robert Ludlum in the same sentence with Cooper and Dickens. But I loved the three of them then, and I still love them today.

 

The novels of Robert Ludlum are not literary classics on a level that competes with Dickens or Cooper, but they are good entertainment. With the reading of my first Ludlum novel, The Parsifal Mosaic, I became hooked on the spy thriller genre of novels. Ludlum passed away several years ago, and even before his death his writing had been curtailed by declining health. So I have been looking for a writer to take his place.

 

Of course, there are the works of Tom Clancy and I have read and enjoyed all of his novels. But it has been a great while since Clancy has published one of his tomes. I have read all of Vince Flynn's works, and while I can say that I enjoyed them, I should also say that Flynn does not provide all of the complicated plot twists that I came to expect from both Ludlum and Clancy. And I have to say that I have not yet begun to like Mitch Rapp, the main character in Flynn's novels.

 

I think that I have stumbled upon a writer who, if he continues to write spy thrillers, and if he can control his desire to insert awkward political commentary into his novels, will have as much success as Ludlum. His name is Alex Berenson and his latest novel is The Ghost War.

 

 

Mr. Berenson is a reporter for The New York Times. Since it has been well-documented that large portions of the reporting in The New York Times is fictional, it should not surprise anyone that a reporter for that paper would be a superior fiction writer. I suppose that fabricating a column on a regular basis would provide a writer with great plot development skills. I can imagine Berenson and Jayson Blair getting together and swapping ideas on various fictional characters and places. You will recall that Jayson Blair was the Times reporter who was finally fired from his job after it was determined that he completely fabricated portions of thirty-six of his reports. Now that I have made my gratuitous attack on The New York Times, I will return to discussing the book.

 

Actually, there is one scene in The Ghost War that takes a clever jab at The New York Times and provides a glimpse at the wit of Mr. Berenson. The scene involves a press conference held by the President's press secretary, and in attendance at the press conference is a New York Times reporter named Dan Spiegel. Berenson describes Spiegel as “smart, but not as smart as he thought himself to be,” and who “liked hearing the sound of this own voice,” and who “believed mistakenly that he was as important as the people he wrote about.” I like a writer who does not take himself too seriously, and Mr. Berenson seems to qualify as just such a writer.

 

A specific example of Berenson's superior character development skills can be found in the character of a homeless Chinese man named Jordan. I was moved by the poignant and realistic depiction of this young man's attitude and the conditions that he endured.

 

It seems to me that in order for a fictional spy in a spy thriller novel to be well-liked, that spy needs to have a tortured soul. It seems as though we need for these fictional characters to be constantly battling the mental anguish that they suffer as a result of the shadowy, bloody world in which they live, and they must always be questioning the morality of their work and the authority that orders them to do their work. For example, Ludlum's character, Jason Bourne, is one of the most successful and famous spy characters ever created and is without a doubt the character who has the most tortured soul. It would be difficult to imagine a character with more soul-searching angst than a man who lost his memory and had to alternately deal with the idea that he might be a paid assassin or that he might be a government operative. The mental anguish that he suffers as he seeks to reconcile himself to slowly learned and sometimes conflicting facts makes him a man with which we can somehow empathize.

 

The main character in The Ghost War, John Wells, is also a tortured soul who is at times troubled by his past actions and is at times conflicted by his personal morality which allows him to take actions which he considers to be moral, but which may not be legal. This internal conflict makes me like him immediately. Indeed, in the acknowledgements for the book, Berenson refers to Wells' tortured soul and acknowledges the help of a Dr. Jacqueline Basha who assisted him in writing about the internal conflict. Actually, Berenson refers to his own personal torture when he says that “without Jackie, John Wells – and his creator – would be a lot more tortured.”

 

We do not know anything about the nature of Berenson's personal torture that required Dr. Basha's assistance, but we do see evidence of his internal conflict in attempting to rise above the baser instincts that are second nature to a New York Times reporter. For the majority of the novel, Berenson is indeed able to rise above the sophomoric writing that seems ingrained in all Times reporters, but in one particular paragraph he fails miserably in his attempt.

 

In The Ghost War, Berenson writes one paragraph that is one of the most utterly moronic paragraphs that I have read in quite some time, and since I read hundreds of books every year, I do tend to encounter quite a number of moronic paragraphs. John Wells has been captured and is about to undergo extreme physical torture. As he contemplates the coming days and hours when he is likely to be beat severely, castrated, have fingers and toes cut off, have eyes poked out, etc., he contemplates the possibility that his coming torture may be “primordial justice” for President Bush having flown out to the USS Abraham Lincoln in May of 2003 and having had his picture taken with the “Mission Accomplished” sign in the background. I am not making this up. It seems that Berenson needed to prove to all of his Times colleagues and his leftist buddies that he still believes the “President George Bush is the root cause of all evil in this world” mantra.

 

I should mention that The Ghost War is a sequel, and I have not yet read the book, The Faithful Spy, which preceded it. But Berenson does a masterful job of preventing any loose ends, so you will not feel any loss of content or connection if you read the sequel first.

 

Berenson leaves little doubt that there will be a sequel to The Ghost War, and we can be fairly certain that the storyline will to some degree involve an arms dealer bent on revenge for the rough manner in which he was treated by Wells. I will purchase that book when it is published, and I can recommend The Ghost War as a good read. But I will say that if Berenson becomes any more moronic or obtrusive with his political commentary, I will quickly begin searching for another replacement for the Ludlum vacancy.

 

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

 

The Ghost War
Alex Berenson

Best Price $12.45
or Buy New $16.47
Trackback(0)
Comments (2)add comment
...
written by Matt Penn , April 07, 2008

I don't really have a problem with Wells' thoughts about George W. Bush, so much as I have a problem with authors who gratuitously put ANY political opinions in the heads of characters who either: a) wouldn't have them given the story's context; or, b) wouldn't have them, period. Unlike you, I understood Berenson's point--that Bush claimed that our mission had been accomplished, while Wells knows all too well that it hasn't been. No, the problem with that paragraph is not that the AUTHOR would write that; it's that the CHARACTER who articulates that thought, wouldn't.

You admit to not having read Berenson's novel "The Faithful Spy", in which John Wells makes his debut. Had you read it, you'd realize that what makes Wells' thought, in that context, "wrong", is that it isn't believable. In the first place, it can't really be an expression of Wells' true feelings. This is a man willing to give his life to defeat the terrorists in "The Faithful Spy"; more importantly, he's a soldier and, whatever else he may think of the president, Wells would recognize that Bush is his commander-in-chief. So, about the worst Wells would likely think, is that the president indeed was the naive cowboy when he uttered his famous miscue.

But more importantly, whereas many are those who do not understand the true meaning of irony (i.e., the disparity between reality and expectation), John Wells is not a character on whom irony is lost. Indeed, it is his insight that makes him more than just a latter-day Rambo in Berenson's novels. Thus, Wells would not be likely to have the thought ascribed to him for the simple reason that, well, he wouldn't see any irony in Bush's standing in front of a banner reading "Mission Accomplished" while standing on the deck of an aircraft carrier in a flight suit. For Wells to see any irony in that image, he would have had to expect that Bush would have known better.

THAT'S the point! If Berenson really wanted to take a swipe at Bush, the way to have done it would have been for Wells to have pointed out the LACK of irony in the whole mis en scene of the ersatz "warrior king"--Bush served in the National Guard, for godsake!--standing in his clown suit in front of that foolish banner.


...
written by Matt Penn , April 08, 2008

Thank you very much for the note you sent. As I said above, I think the issue is not characters--even ones in thrillers--going off on their little jeremiads (anti-Bush or otherwise), so much as it's verisimilitude. Do I really believe that a character would have this or that thought? Do I really believe, for example, that John Wells would be ruminating about (supposed)ironies while trying not to get his head blown off by jihadis?

If you've ever read the work of the best-selling author Michael Connelly, you see that he's so fallen in love with his creation LAPD detective Harry Bosch, that he's forgotten what he's created in him, and now ascribes to Bosch whatever he (Connelly) dreams of himself. That's a problem I see many authors (actors too, for that matter) fall into--you're not the character you're creating! The character must be believeable to the reader, even within the context of an "alien" mindset. For instance, I might not think like Hannibal Lecter, but nor can Thomas Harris have Hannibal Lecter do something that would be contrary to the monster's m.o. If you read that Lecter was given to catching and releasing mice, say, you should think to yourself, "Bulls**t! He doesn't DO that; he's a serial killer for godsake!"

To Connelly's credit, Bosch, unlike Wells, never actually gets the girl. His marriage to Eleanor Wish is the stuff of that most cliched of "cop-lit" conceits (i.e., it ended in divorce), but nor has Harry Bosch wound up ensconced in the trappings of domesticity with FBI Special Agent Rachel Walling.

Even still, I recall reading a thriller once where, in one set piece, a serial killer is dancing with his intended victim, whom he seeks to lure back to his apartment to drug and kill. I thought, "Right! So when this maladjusted loner isn't busy purchasing smocks, formaldehyde, and all the other stuff he has in his basement chamber of horrors, he's learning the Cha Cha at Arthur Murray. Sure. I believe that."

NOT!

For a good example of authors who really do have fine ears for not only dialog, but also the internal dialogs ascribed to their protagonists, read the outstanding police procedurals "Hollywood Station" and "Lush Life" by Joseph Wambaugh and Richard Price, respectively. Each novel is pitch perfect, and while both contain their colorful moments, the patois and even the humor present does not seem forced. Rather, the reader is left believing that, yes, this really IS what this or that character would say or do.


Thanks again for your note. I really liked your review.



Write comment
password
 

Copyright 2007. All Rights Reserved.
busy
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 28 October 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >

CB Login

Who's Online

DVD Of The Month

Buttons

rss
Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Add to Plusmo
Add to My AOL
Add to Technorati Favorites
Creative Commons License
This work by JaaJoe.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Based on a work at jaajoe.com.
YNDHNSXDKRGC